Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in the surgical treatment of hypospadias in children
https://doi.org/10.46563/1560-9561-2025-28-6-429-433
EDN: ozueic
Abstract
Introduction. Hypospadias remains a relevant and challenging problem for surgeons. The rate of complications is still considerably high, with many authors reporting figures ranging from 10% to 50% or even more. Urinary tract infection (UTI) and surgical site infection (SSI) in the postoperative period are among the causes of long-term complications following hypospadias repair. However, according to a number of authors, SSI in hypospadias surgery is relatively rare. Consequently, with the recent increase in antibiotic resistance, the necessity of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for distal forms of hypospadias in children has been called into question. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and advisability of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in the surgical treatment of distal hypospadias in children.
Materials and methods. A prospective randomized study was conducted from 2023 to 2025, involving 122 boys aged 1 to 3 years with distal hypospadias. The patients were divided into two equal groups of 61 patients each. Patients in group 1 received perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for 3–5 days. Patients in group 2 did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis. All patients underwent urethroplasty using one of three techniques: MAGPI, Mathieu, or TIP. The primary outcome of the study was the presence of a SSI, defined as erythema, pronounced edema, or purulent discharge from the surgical wound, as well as UTI, manifested as pyuria and bacteriuria. The secondary outcome was the incidence of late postoperative complications (urethral fistula, meatal stenosis, wound dehiscence, urethral diverticulum). All patients were followed up for at least 6 months postoperatively.
Results. The following results were obtained. In group 1, UTI was observed in 5 patients (8.2%), compared to 13 patients (21.3%) in group 2. SSI was noted in 2 (3.3%) patients in group 1 and in 6 (9.8%) patients in group 2. When assessing long-term postoperative complications over six or more months, meatal stenosis was observed in 2 (3.3%) patients in group 1 and in 1 (1.6%) patient in group 2. Urethral fistulas developed in 3 (4.9%) patients in group 1 and in 4 (6.6%) patients in group 2. A urethral diverticulum was noted in 1 (1.6%) patient with meatal stenosis in group 1. Wound dehiscence occurred in one boy (1.6%) from group 1 and in 2 (3.3%) patients from group 2. The total complication rate in both groups was 11.5%.
Conclusions. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the incidence of SSI and UTI in the surgical treatment of distal hypospadias but does not lead to improved long-term outcomes. The benefit of prophylactic antibiotic administration in this context is questionable.
Contribution:
Sukhodolsky A.A. — concept and design of the study;
Sukhodolsky A.A., Fedulov A.V., Sytkov V.V., Yanorova A.I., Anikeeva Yu.A., Mikhailov E.S., Nechay A.V. — collection and processing of the material;
Sukhodolsky A.A., Fedulov A.V. — writing the text;
Sukhodolsky A.A., Zorkin S.N., Poddubny I.V., Sytkov V.V., Chernukha M.Yu. — editing the text.
All co-authors — approval of the final version of the article, responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the article.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the state budget-funded research program of the Moscow Region: “Study of the Efficacy of Perioperative Antibiotic Therapy in the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Children with Diseases of the Urinary System”.
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Received: October 30, 2025
Accepted: November 27, 2025
Published: December 25, 2025
About the Authors
Andrey A. SukhodolskiyRussian Federation
MD, PhD, Pediatric Surgeon, Head of the Scientific Department of Pediatric Uroandrology, Scientific Research Clinical Institute of Childhood; Head of the Scientific Department of Pediatric Uro-Andrology, Moscow Regional Center for Maternal and Child Health; Assistant Prof. at the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Russian University of Medicine
e-mail: asuh1@yandex.ru
Sergey N. Zorkin
Russian Federation
Igor V. Poddubny
Russian Federation
Valentin V. Sytkov
Russian Federation
Anisiya I. Yanorova
Russian Federation
Yulia A. Anikeeva
Russian Federation
Elena V. Fedorova
Russian Federation
Evgeniy S. Mikhailov
Russian Federation
Alexandr V. Fedulov
Russian Federation
Mariya Yu. Chernukha
Russian Federation
Andrey V. Nechay
Russian Federation
Gaydar M. Magomedov
Russian Federation
References
1. Karpov O.E., Gusarov V.G., Zamyatin M.N., Orlova O.A., Petrova L.V., Kamyshova D.A. and others. Management of antibiotic resistance in the hospital: current realities and prospects. Klinicheskaya mikrobiologiya i antimikrobnaya khimiotherapiya. 2020; 22(4): 277–86. https://doi.org/10.36488/cmac.2020.4.277-286 https://elibrary.ru/disfxy (in Russian)
2. Parshin D.S., Topchiev M.A., Astakhin V.A., Chechukhina O.B., Smirnyagina E.O., Ravsky E.N. Infections in the field of surgical intervention: risk factors for multiple antibiotic resistance in abdominal surgery. Neotlozhnaya meditsinskaya pomoshch. 2024; 13(3): 410–8. https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2024-13-3-410-418202 https://elibrary.ru/fijadx (in Russian)
3. Poddubny I.V., Sytkov V.V., Vorobyeva Yu.D., Shcherbakova O.V., Dronov I.A., Bykov M.V. Principles of rational antibacterial preventive therapy in children after colorectal surgery. Voprosy praktidheskoy pediatrii. 2020; 15(4): 129–34. https://doi.org/10.20953/1817-7646-2020-4-129-134 https://elibrary.ru/nyhjxi (in Russian)
4. Vdovtsev V.Yu., Kozyrev G.V., Manasherova D.T. Basic principles of hypospadias surgery in Russia at the turn of the 19th–20th centuries. Voprosy urologii i andrologii. 2023; 11(2): 5–8. https://elibrary.ru/jxssgi (in Russian)
5. Rudin Yu.E., Romikh V.V., Garmanova T.N., Marukhnenko D.V. Functional results of hypospadias correction based on uroflowmetry data. Eksperimentalnaya i klinicheskaya urologiya. 2015; (3): 88–91. https://elibrary.ru/vosgnh (in Russian)
6. Poddubny I.V., Yatsyk S.P., Fedorova E.V., Petrova M.G., Ranshakov A.S., Trunov V.O., et al. Evaluation of five years of experience in the treatment of hypospadias in children. Reproduktivnoe zdorov’e detey i podrostkov. 2022; 18(3): 73–84. https://doi.org/10.33029/1816-2134-2022-18-3-73-84 (in Russian)
7. Marchenko A.S., Smirnov I.E., Zorkin S.N., Apakina A.V., Sukhodolsky A.A., Shakhnovsky D.S. Treatment of children with hypospadias. Detskaya khirurgiya. 2013; (5): 40–4. https://elibrary.ru/rvlliv (in Russian)
8. Akramov N.R., Kagantsov I.M., Sizonov V.V., Batrutdinov R.T., Dubrov V.I., Khaertdinov E.I. A new variant of the technique of displacement urethroplasty with non-dissecting spongioplasty in distal forms of hypospadias in children. Vestnik urologii. 2020; 8(3): 5–12. https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2020-8-3-5-12 https://elibrary.ru/ihonph (in Russian)
9. Tibilov A.Z., Kireeva N.B. Method of surgical treatment of distal forms of hypospadias. Rossiyskiy vestnik detskoy khirurgii, anesthesiologii i reanimatologii. 2021; 11(S): 149. https://elibrary.ru/toxzsn (in Russian)
10. Baskin L.S., Ebbers M.B. Hypospadias: anatomy, etiology, and technique. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2006; 41(3): 463–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.11.059
11. Anttila A., Lahdes-Vasama T., Pakkasjärvi N., Taskinen S. Cumulative re-operation rates during follow-up after hypospadias repair. BJU Int. 2024; 134(6): 960–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16519
12. Wang C.X., Zhang W.P., Song H.C. Complications of proximal hypospadias repair with transverse preputial island flap urethroplasty: a 15-year experience with long-term follow-up. Asian J. Androl. 2019; 21(3): 300–3. https://doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_115_18
13. Canon S.J., Smith J.C., Sullivan E., Patel A., Zamilpa I. Comparative analysis of perioperative prophylactic antibiotics in prevention of surgical site infections in stented, distal hypospadias repair. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2021; 17(2): 256.e1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.11.033
14. Baillargeon E., Duan K., Brzezinski A., Jednak R., El-Sherbiny M. The role of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics in hypospadias repair. Can. Urol. Assoc. J. 2014; 8(7-8): 236–40. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.1838
15. Chua M.E., Kim J.K., Rivera K.C., Ming J.M., Flores F., Farhat W.A. The use of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in stented distal hypospadias repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2019; 15(2): 138–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.10.012
16. Basin M.F., Gopalakrishnan M., Ackerman N., Mason M.D., Tracey A.J., Souid A., et al. Utility of preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in hypospadias repair: results from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric Registry. J. Urol. 2025; 214(2): 210–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004558
17. Fuentes Carretero S., Grande Moreillo C., Vicente Sánchez N., Margarit Mallol J. Postoperative care in hypospadias. Common practices and evidence available. Cir. Pediatr. 2024; 37(2): 79–83. https://doi.org/10.54847/cp.2024.02.17
18. Snodgrass W., Wein A.J., Kavoussi L.R., Novick A.C. Hypospadias. In: Campbell-Walsh Urology. Volume 4. Elsevier; 2011: 3485–506.
19. Snodgrass W., Bush N. Commentary to ‘Is parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis associated with fewer infectious complications stented, distal hypospadias repair? J. Pediatr. Urol. 2022; 18(6): 764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol
Review
For citations:
Sukhodolskiy A.A., Zorkin S.N., Poddubny I.V., Sytkov V.V., Yanorova A.I., Anikeeva Yu.A., Fedorova E.V., Mikhailov E.S., Fedulov A.V., Chernukha M.Yu., Nechay A.V., Magomedov G.M. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in the surgical treatment of hypospadias in children. M.Ya. Studenikin Russian Pediatric Journal. 2025;28(6):429-433. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46563/1560-9561-2025-28-6-429-433. EDN: ozueic
JATS XML





















