Computed tomography in skull base fractures in infants and young children

Aim of the study is to show the possibilities of multiplanar reformation and 3D reconstructions of computed tomography in the diagnosis of skull base fractures in young children.

Materials and methods. In one thousand three hundred thirty four children under 3 years of age with traumatic brain injury (TBI) CT was performed on a 128-slice Philips Ingenuity CT scanner; in 707 (53%) in the first 6 hours, in 254 (19%) — after 6 hours, but during the first 24 hours, in 205 (15%) children within 3 days and in 168 (13%) children later on 3 days after injury. Scanning of the area of interest (head + cervical spine) was made with the maximum possible reduction in parameters to minimize the radiation dose. Contrast was not used in children from 0 to 3 years of age with TBI. Post-processing included isotropic multi-planar reformatted (MPR) and 3D images.

Results. Of the 1334 children examined, 730 were boys and 604 were girls. In 448 (33.58%) children, fractures of the skull bones were diagnosed, in 366 (81.7%) of them, fractures were combined with intracranial injuries. Fractures of the skull base were in 83 (18.52%) of 448 children. In 65% (n = 54) of cases, basal fractures were combined with fractures of the temporal bones, 31.5% (n = 17) of these children had liquorrhea. Fractures of the anterior fossa (12% of the total number of fractures of the base of the skull) of the base of the skull or fronto-basal fractures were accompanied by additional fractures of the orbits and/or other bones of the facial skull in 56.6% of cases. Fractures of the middle cranial fossa were diagnosed in 54 (65%) children. Fractures of the posterior cranial fossa were found in 19 (23%) of 83 children. In addition to fractures of the bones of the base of the skull, 32 (38.6%) children were diagnosed with fractures of the bones of the vault and intracranial injuries.

Conclusion. The use of multiplanar reformation and 3D reconstruction increased the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosing skull base fractures in children compared to conventional axial CT. The essential advantages of using 3D reconstruction are the availability of the technique, the absence of additional scanning time and radiation exposure.

Contribution:
Zaitseva E.S., Akhadov T.A., Melnikov I.A. — research concept and design;
Zaitseva E.S., Mamatkulov A.D., Bozhko O.V., Dmitrenko D.M. — conducting research;
Zaitseva E.S., Mamatkulov A.D. — collection and analysis of data;
Ublinskiy M.V., Manzhurtsev A.V., Khusainova D.N. — statistical analysis;
Akhadov T.A. — writing text;
Zaitseva E.S., Bozhko O.V., Ublinskiy M.V. — editing.
All co-authors — approval of the final version of the article, responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the article.

Acknowledgment. The study had no sponsorship. 

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Received: December 14, 2022
Accepted: January 17, 2023
Published: February 28, 2023

1. Zaytseva E.S., Mamatkulov A.D., Akhadov T.A. Computed tomography of traumatic brain injury in infants and young children (a literature review). Meditsinskaya vizualizatsiya. 2022; 26(2): 39–57. https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-1116 (in Russian)

2. John S.M., Kelly P., Vincent A. Patterns of structural head injury in children younger than 3 years: a ten-year review of 519 patients. J. Trauma. Acute Care Surg. 2013; 74(1): 276–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318270d82e

3. Easter J.S., Bakes K., Dhaliwal J., Miller M., Caruso E., Haukoos J.S. Comparison of PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE rules for children with minor head injury: a prospective cohort study. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2014; 64(2): 145–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.01.030

4. Ringl H., Schernthaner R.E., Schueller G., Balassy C., Kienzl D., Botosaneanu A., et al. The skull unfolded: a cranial CT visualization algorithm for fast and easy detection of skull fractures. Radiology. 2010; 255(2): 553–62. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10091096

5. Lee H.R., Kim J.Y., Lim Y.C., Yoon S.H. Pediatric skull fractures based on three-dimensional computed tomography: correlation of skull fracture types, location, severity, and accompanying head injuries with surgical risk in 291 children. The Nerve. 2019; 5(2): 55–9. https://doi.org/10.21129/nerve.2019.5.2.55

6. Juliano A.F., Ginat D.T., Moonis G. Imaging review of the temporal bone. II. Traumatic, postoperative, and noninflammatory nonneoplastic conditions. Radiology. 2015; 276(3): 655–72. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015140800

7. Baugnon K.L., Hudgins P.A. Skull base fractures and their complications. Neuroimaging Clin. N. Am. 2014; 24(3): 439–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2014.03.001

8. Bonfield C.M., Naran S., Adetayo O.A., Pollack I.F., Losee J.E. Pediatric skull fractures: the need for surgical intervention, characteristics, complications, and outcomes. J. Neurosurg. Pediatr. 2014; 14(2): 205–11. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.5.PEDS13414

9. Orman G., Wagner M.W., Seeburg D., Zamora C.A., Oshmyansky A., Tekes A., et al. Pediatric skull fracture diagnosis: should 3D CT reconstructions be added as routine imaging? J. Neurosurg. Pediatr. 2015; 16(4): 426–31. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.3.PEDS1553

10. Faried A., Halim D., Widjaya I.A., Badri R.F., Sulaiman S.F., Arifin M.Z. Correlation between the skull base fracture and the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with traumatic brain injury. Chin. J. Traumatol. 2019; 22(5): 286–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2019.05.006

11. Sim S.Y., Kim H.G., Yoon S.H., Choi J.W., Cho S.M., Choi M.S. Reappraisal of pediatric diastatic skull fractures in the 3-dimensional CT era: Clinical characteristics and comparison of diagnostic accuracy of simple skull X-ray, 2-dimensional CT, and 3-dimensional CT. World Neurosurg. 2017; 108: 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.107

12. Archer J.B., Sun H., Bonney P.A., Zhao Y.D., Hiebert J.C., Sanclement J.A., et al. Extensive traumatic anterior skull base fractures with cerebrospinal fluid leak: classification and repair techniques using combined vascularized tissue flaps. J. Neurosurg. 2016; 124(3): 647–56. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.4.JNS1528

13. Bell R.B., Chen J. Frontobasilar fractures: contemporary management. Atlas Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. North Am. 2010; 18(2): 181–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cxom.2010.08.003

14. Baráth K., Huber A.M., Stämpfli P., Varga Z., Kollias S. Neuroradiology of cholesteatomas. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2011; 32(2): 221–9. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2052

15. Feldman J.S., Farnoosh S., Kellman R.M., Tatum S.A. Skull base trauma: clinical considerations in evaluation and diagnosis and review of management techniques and surgical approaches. Semin. Plast. Surg. 2017; 31(4): 177–88. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1607275

16. Jin H., Gong S., Han K., Wang J., Lv L., Dong Y., et al. Clinical management of traumatic superior orbital fissure and orbital apex syndromes. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2018; 165: 50–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.12.022

17. Martin A., Paddock M., Johns C.S., Smith J., Raghavan A., Connolly D.J.A., et al. Avoiding skull radiographs in infants with suspected inflicted injury who also undergo head CT: “a no-brainer?”. Eur. Radiol. 2020; 30(3): 1480–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06579-w

18. Araki T., Yokota H., Morit A. Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Characteristic Features, Diagnosis, and Management. Neurol. Med. Chir (Tokyo). 2017; 57(2): 82–93. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.ra.2016-0191

19. Alhelali I., Stewart T.C., Foster J., Alharfi I.M., Ranger A., Daoud H., et al. Basal skull fractures are associated with mortality in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury. J. Trauma. Acute. Care. Surg. 2015; 78(6): 1155–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000662

20. Nigrovic L.E., Kuppermann N. Children with minor blunt head trauma presenting to the emergency department. Pediatrics. 2019; 144(6): e20191495. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1495

21. Hagga J.R., Dogra V.S., Forsting M., Gilkeson R.C., Ha H.K., Sundaram M. CT and MRI of the whole body, 5th ed, 2-Vol. set. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2009; 30(7): e103–4. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1609

22. Nakahara K., Shimizu S., Kitahara T., Oka H., Utsuki S., Soma K., et al. Linear fractures invisible on routine axial computed tomography: a pitfall at radiological screening for minor head injury. Neurol. Med. Chir. (Tokyo). 2011; 51(4): 272–4. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.51.272

23. Zayas J.O., Feliciano Y.Z., Hadley C.R., Gomez A.A., Vidal J.A. Temporal bone trauma and the role of multidetector CT in the emergency department. Radiographics. 2011; 31(6): 1741–55. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.316115506

24. Menon A., Kanchan T., Rao N.K.G. Skull fractures in fatal head injuries –a comparative analysis of ct and autopsy findings. Intl. J. Med. Toxicol. Leg. Med. 2010; 13(1): 11–4.

25. Henningsen M.J., Harving M.L., Jacobsen C., Villa C. Fractures of the neuro-cranium: sensitivity and specificity of post-mortem computed tomography compared with autopsy. Int. J. Legal. Med. 2022; 136(5): 1379–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-022-02779-0

26. Chawla H., Yadav R.K., Griwan M.S., Malhotra R., Paliwal P.K. Sensitivity and specificity of CT scan in revealing skull fracture in medico-legal head injury victims. Australas. Med. J. 2015; 8(7): 235–8. https://doi.org/10.4066/AMJ.2015.2418