Fetoinfantile losses — from myths to reality

The literature review shows fetoinfantile losses to characterize not only the health of the population and its reproductive potential, but also the social and economic living conditions of the population, the medical care quality, the implementation of modern technologies. They are believed to have a significant impact on basic socio-demographic indicators. According to WHO recommendations, this integrated indicator should be used as a new methodological approach to analyze the activities of maternity and childhood services, to develop the most effective management decisions for the prevention of infant and perinatal mortality. The review presents the features of birth registration in Russia since the adoption by the WHO General Assembly in 1950 of definitions and criteria of such perinatal concepts as “live-born”, “stillborn”, “viable fetus”, “abortion” corresponding to world ethical concepts to the present. The complete transition to international birth registration criteria in 2012 was the most important event in the further reduction of fetoinfantile losses in the country. Thus, the inclusion of infants with extremely low body weight in the number of live births required the use of the highest technologies not only to prevent death, but also their disability, domestic statistics indicators of fetoinfantile losses have become more reliable and comparable to international ones. In the context of the new requirements to birth registration, an analysis of the infant mortality accounting in the regions of Russia was carried out according to five specially developed criteria, as well as the reconstruction of its indicators using a recalculation model for the level of postnatal mortality. It was established that the unreliable presentation of information continues — there is a repetition of the trends observed in previous years, only the extreme weight category has changed. Provided data show the validity of the proposed infant mortality undercount criteria, allowing researchers to recommend them for use in practical healthcare.

Acknowledgment. The study had no sponsorship.

Conflict of interest. The author declares no conflict of interest.

Received: June 15, 2022
Accepted: June 29, 2022
Published: August 30, 2022

1. Al’bitskiy V.Yu., Vaganov N.N., Rezaykin V.I. Guidance on Methods for Studying and Analyzing Infant Mortality [Rukovodstvo po metodam izucheniya i analiza mladencheskoy smertnosti]. Nizhniy Novgorod; 1991. (in Russian)

2. Al’bitskiy V.Yu., Nikol’skaya L.A., Abrosimova M.Yu. Fetoinfantile Losses [Fetoinfantil’nye poteri]. Kazan’; 1997. (in Russian)

3. Frolova O.G., Pugacheva T.N., Gudimova V.V., Glinyanaya S.V. New methodological approaches to assessing pregnancy outcomes. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 1994; 70(2): 11–3. (in Russian)

4. Starodubov V.I., Suhanova L.P., Sychenkov Ju.G. Reproductive losses as medical social problem in demographic development of Russia. Sotsial’nye aspekty zdorov’ya naseleniya. 2011; 22(6). URL: https://vestnik.mednet. ru/content/view/367/27/lang,ru/ (in Russian)

5. Andreev E.M., Kvasha E.A., Khar’kova T.L. Mortality and Life Expectancy. Population of Russia [Smertnost’ i prodolzhitel’nost’ zhizni. Naselenie Rossii]. Moscow: Universitet; 2002. (in Russian)

6. WHO. Making every baby count: audit and review of stillbirths and neonatal deaths. Geneva; 2016.

7. Barfield W.D. Standard terminology for fetal, infant, and perinatal deaths. Pediatrics. 2016; 137(5): e20160551. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-0551

8. Smith L.K., Hindori-Mohangoo A.D., Delnord M., Durox M., Szamotulska K., Macfarlane A., et al. Quantifying the burden of stillbirths before 28 weeks of completed gestational age in high-income countries: a population-based study of 19 European countries. Lancet. 2018; 392(10158): 1639–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31651-9

9. Zelinskaya D.I., Terletskaya R.N., Rozhkovskaya S.A. Medico-social aspects of health of children in large families. Rossiyskiy pediatricheskiy zhurnal. 2016; 19(6): 361–6. https://doi.org/10.18821/1560-9561-2016-19(6)-361-366 (in Russian)

10. Al’bitskiy V.Yu., Terletskaya R.N. The infant mortality in the Russian Federation in conditions of new requirements to birth registration. Problemy sotsial’noy gigieny, zdravookhraneniya i istorii meditsiny. 2016; 24(6): 340–5. https://doi.org/10.18821/0869-866-2016-24-6-340-345 (in Russian)

11. Peller S. Proper delineation of the neonatal period in perinatal mortality. Am. J. Public Health Nations Health. 1965; 55(7): 1005−11. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.55.7.1005

12. Al’bitskiy V.Yu., Terletskaya R.N. The Infant Mortality in the Russian Federation in Conditions of New Requirements to Birth Registration [Mladencheskaya smertnost’ v Rossiyskoy Federatsii v usloviyakh novykh trebovaniy k registratsii rozhdeniya]. Moscow: Pediatr””; 2016. (in Russian)

13. Ignat’eva R.K. Perinatal Problems. Myths and Reality [Perinatal’nye problemy. Mify i real’nost’]. Moscow; 2006. (in Russian)

14. Al’bitskiy V.Yu. Transition to international infant mortality registration criteria. Yes or no? Vrach. 1990; (2): 36−8. (in Russian)

15. Terletskaya R.N., Fisenko A.P., Timofeeva A.G., Konova S.R. Causes of pediatric out-of-hospital deaths. Rossiyskiy pediatricheskiy zhurnal. 2020; 23(5): 304–12. https://doi.org/10.18821/1560-9561-2020-23-5-304-312 (in Russian)

16. Maruthappu M., Ng K.Y., Williams C., Atun R., Zeltner T. Government health care spending and child mortality. Pediatrics. 2015; 135(4): e887–94. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1600

17. Sukhanova L.P., Bushmeleva N.N., Sorokina Z.Kh. Infantile mortality in Russia: the issue of verified registration. Sotsial’nye aspekty zdorov’ya naseleniya. 2012; (6): 2. (in Russian)

18. Sukhanova L.P. Pregnancy outcomes and perinatal losses in the context of new birth criteria. Sotsial’nye aspekty zdorov’ya naseleniya. 2013; (3): 7. (in Russian)

19. Karlsson O., Dribe M., Subramanian S.V. Changing speed of reduction in under-5 mortality rates over the 20th century. J. Epidemiol. Community Health. 2021; 75(1): 36–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2019-213045

20. Nikolaeva E.I., Frolova O.G., Golubev V.A. Pregnancy termination outcomes at 22–27 weeks. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2007; (2): 59−60. (in Russian)

21. Baybarina E.N. The main areas of activity of the Ministry of Health of Russia in the field of children’s health. Zamestitel’ glavnogo vracha. 2013; (5): 11−6. (in Russian)

22. Starodubov V.I., Sukhanova L.P. Reproductive Problems of Demographic Development of Russia [Reproduktivnye problemy demograficheskogo razvitiya Rossii]. Moscow: Menedzher zdravookhraneniya; 2012. (in Russian)

23. Radzinskiy V.E. Unresolved Reproductive Medicine Issues: Act Speech. In: Materials of the Scientific Program of the 5th All-Russian Seminar «Reproductive Potential of Russia: Versions and Counter-Versions» [Materialy nauchnoy programmy 5-go obshcherossiyskogo seminara «Reproduktivnyy potentsial Rossii: versii i kontrversii»]. Sochi: Status Praesens; 2012: 4−6. (in Russian)

24. Andreev E.M., Kvasha E.A. New infant mortality count: Preliminary totals. Demoskop Weekly. 2013; (541-542): 35–40. (in Russian)

25. Masquelier B., Hug L., Sharrow D., You D., Mathers C., Gerland P., et al. Global, regional, and national mortality trends in youth aged 15-24 years between 1990 and 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob. Health. 2021; 9(4): e409–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00023-1

26. Population Reference Bureau. World Population Data Sheet; 2014. Available at: https://www.prb.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2014-world-population-data-sheet_eng.pdf

27. Bezhenar’ V.F., Ivanova L.A., Grigor’ev S.G. High-risk pregnancy and perinatal losses. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2020; (3): 42–7. https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.3.42-47 (in Russian)

28. Bezhenar’ V.F., Ivanova L.A., Ivanov D.O. Legal aspects of perinatal loss. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh bolezney. 2021; 70(3): 143–50. https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD64324 (in Russian)

29. Zelinskaya D.I., Keshishyan E.S., Terletskaya R.N. Nursing Care for Newborns on an Outpatient Basis [Sestrinskiy uhod za novorozhdennymi v ambulatornykh usloviyakh]. Moscow: GЕOTAR; 2021. (in Russian)

30. Mirzabekova B.T. Potential risk factors of perinatal losses. Vestnik poslediplomnogo obrazovaniya v sfere zdravookhraneniya. 2020; (1): 58–64. (in Russian)

31. Pestrikova T.Yu., Yurasova E.A., Yurasov I.V., Bloshchinskaya I.A., Knyazeva T.P. Perinatal losses: problems, priorities, potentials. Dal’nevostochnyy meditsinskiy zhurnal. 2020; (3): 114–9. https://doi.org/10.35177/1994-5191-2020-3-114-119 (in Russian)

32. Ivanov D.O., Shevtsova K.G., Moiseeva K.E., Kharbediya Sh.D. Results of the perinatal audit of the northwestern federal district. Kazanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal. 2020; 101(5): 727–33. https://doi.org/10.17816/KMJ2020-727 (in Russian)