Improvement of surgical treatment of posterior meniscus injuries in children
https://doi.org/10.46563/1560-9561-2025-28-5-337-343
EDN: bkzwbt
Abstract
Background. Meniscal injuries in children and adolescents are being reported with increasing frequency, which is associated with the growth of sports activity and advances in imaging techniques. Current treatment strategies focus on maximal preservation of the meniscus. The “all-inside” technique enables posterior horn repair without additional incisions; however, its use is limited by the high cost of disposable imported devices. Aim of the study. To improve the effectiveness and safety of posterior horn meniscus repair in children using a reusable guide.
Materials and methods. A retrospective comparison was conducted in one hundred patients aged of 5–17 years with posterior horn meniscus tears. Group 1 (n = 50) underwent “all-inside” repair with commercial anchor systems, while group 2 (n = 50) was treated using the original “Reverse” technique with a reusable instrument. The mean follow-up period was of 17–18 months.
Results. The recurrence rate was 2% in the “Reverse” group and 4% in the standard repair group (p = 1.0). No significant differences in complications were observed between groups. The “Reverse” technique allowed placing of a greater number of vertically oriented sutures without increasing the cost of surgery.
Conclusion. Arthroscopic posterior horn meniscus repair in children using the “Reverse” reusable guide demonstrated comparable outcomes to commercial all-inside systems at short-term follow-up. Economic accessibility and the ability to place anatomically stable vertical sutures make the technique a promising option for clinical practice.
Contribution:
Basargin D.Yu., Chelpachenko O.B. — concept and design of the study;
Basargin D.Yu., Vorobiev D.A., Lushnikov A.M. — collection and processing of material;
Basargin D.Yu., Lushnikov A.M. — statistical processing of material;
Basargin D.Yu., Chelpachenko O.B. — writing the text, editing the text.
All co-authors — approval of the final version of the article, responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the article.
Acknowledgment. The study had no sponsorship.
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Received: September 17, 2025
Accepted: October 02, 2025
Published: October 30, 2025
About the Authors
Dmitry Yu. BasarginRussian Federation
Research fellow, traumatologist-orthopedist of the traumatology department of the Research Institute of Emergency Children’s Surgery and Traumatology — Dr. Roshal’s Clinic” of the Moscow Department of Health
e-mail: orrng115@yandex.ru
Oleg B. Chelpachenko
Russian Federation
Denis A. Vorobyov
Russian Federation
Alexander M. Lushnikov
Russian Federation
References
1. Gabr A., Williams S., Dodd S., Barton-Hanson N. Outcome of meniscal repairs in paediatric population: A tertiary centre experience. World J Orthop. 2024; 15(6): 547–53. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i6.547
2. Kawashima I., Kawai R., Ishizuka S., Hiraiwa H., Tsukahara T., Imagama S. Association between knee alignment and meniscal tear in pediatric patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2021; 103(17): 1604–10. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.01219
3. Jackson T., Fabricant P.D., Beck N., Storey E., Patel N.M., Ganley T.J. Epidemiology, injury patterns, and treatment of meniscal tears in pediatric patients: a 16-year experience of a single center. Orthop. J. Sports Med. 2019; 7(12): 2325967119890325. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967119890325
4. Kuczyński N., Boś J., Białoskórska K., Aleksandrowicz Z., Turoń B., Zabrzyńska M., et al. The meniscus: basic science and therapeutic approaches. J. Clin. Med. 2025; 14(6): 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14062020
5. Mameri E.S., Dasari S.P., Fortier L.M., Verdejo F.G., Gursoy S., Yanke A.B., et al. Review of meniscus anatomy and biomechanics. Curr. Rev. Musculoskelet. Med. 2022; 15(5): 323–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-022-09768-1
6. Di Paolo S., Grassi A., Lucidi G.A., Macchiarola L., Dal Fabbro G., Zaffagnini S. Biomechanics of the lateral meniscus: evidences from narrative review. Ann. Jt. 2022: 19. https://doi.org/10.21037/aoj-20-123
7. Simonetta R., Russo A., Palco M., Costa G.G., Mariani P.P. Meniscus tears treatment: The good, the bad and the ugly-patterns classification and practical guide. World J. Orthop. 2023; 14(4): 171–85. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v14.i4.171
8. DePhillipo N.N., Moatshe G., Brady A., Chahla J., Aman Z.S., Dornan G.J., et al. Effect of meniscocapsular and meniscotibial lesions in ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed knees: a biomechanical study. Am. J. Sports Med. 2018; 46(10): 2422–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518774315
9. Migliorini F., Schäfer L., Bell A., Weber C.D., Vecchio G., Maffulli N. Meniscectomy is associated with a higher rate of osteoarthritis compared to meniscal repair following acute tears: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2023; 31(12): 5485–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07600-y
10. Mordecai S.C. Treatment of meniscal tears: An evidence based approach. World J. Orthop. 2014; 5(3): 233–41. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v5.i3.233
11. Popper H.R., Fliegel B.E., Elliott D.M., Su A.W. Surgical management of traumatic meniscus injuries. Pathophysiology. 2023; 30(4): 618–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathophysiology30040044
12. Razi M., Mortazavi S.J. Save the meniscus, a good strategy to preserve the knee. Arch. Bone Jt Surg. 2020; 8(1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.22038/abjs.2019.45438.2242
13. Meng C.Y., Feng W., Ren Y.Z., Liu M., Wang J.Y., Han C.X. A reverse suture anchor technique for arthroscopic medial meniscus root repair. Arthrosc. Techs. 2024; 13(6): 102970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2024.102970
14. Magee L.C., Mehta N.N., Wright M.L., Leska T.M., Ganley T.J. Management of pediatric meniscal root tears. J. Pediatr. Orthop. Soc. N. Am. 2020; 2(3): 110. https://doi.org/10.55275/JPOSNA-2020-110
15. Mitchell J., Graham W., Best T.M., Collins C., Currie D.W., Comstock R.D., et al. Epidemiology of meniscal injuries in US high school athletes between 2007 and 2013. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2016; 24(3): 715–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2008.10.002
16. Vint H., Quartley M., Robinson J.R. All-inside versus inside-out meniscal repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee. 2021; 28: 326–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2020.12.005
17. Chang J.H., Shen H.C., Huang G.S., Pan R.Y., Wu C.F., Lee C.H., et al. A Biomechanical Comparison of all-inside meniscus repair techniques. J. Surg. Res. 2009; 155(1): 82–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2008.10.002
18. Bryantsev A.V., Meshcheryakov S.V., Chelpachenko O.B., Basargin D.Yu., Vorobyov D.A., Sidorov S.V., et al. A method for arthroscopic suturing of the meniscus of the knee joint and a surgical instrument for its implementation. Patent RF № 2832001; 2024. (in Russian)
19. Swiontkowski M., Resnick L. Getting a good grip is key to all-inside meniscal repair. JBJS Case Connector. 2015; 5(3): e61. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.CC.O.00141
20. Warth L.C., Bollier M.J., Hoffman D.F., Cummins J.S., Hall M.M. New complication associated with all-inside meniscal repair device: ultrasound-aided diagnosis and operative localization of foreign body reaction. Orthop. J. Sports Med. 2016; 4(9): 2325967116664882. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967116664882
21. Uchida R., Horibe S., Ohori T., Shino K. All-inside suture meniscal repair using suture passer. Ann. Jt. 2024; 9: 29. https://doi.org/10.21037/aoj-24-4
22. Mine T., Ihara K., Kawamura H., Shinohara M., Kuriyama R., Tominaga Y. Migration of a meniscal repair implant mimicking meniscal injury. Open Orthop. J. 2020; 14(1): 117–9. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325002014010117
23. Ali R., Sulaiman M.A., Mariam F., Baloch N. Perspective on clinical and functional outcomes of arthroscopic all-inside meniscal repair: insights from a lower middle-income country. Cureus. 2024; 16(6): e62664. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.62664
24. Deviandri R., Daulay M.C., Iskandar D., Kautsar A.P., Lubis A.M.T., Postma M.J. Health-economic evaluation of meniscus tear treatments: a systematic review. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2023; 31(9): 3582–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07278-8
25. Avila A., Rao N., Buzin S., Shankar D.S., Davidson P., Strauss E.J. Arthroscopic meniscus repair using an all-inside, all-suture, knotless device. Arthrosc. Tech. 2023; 12(5): e615–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2022.12.017
26. Hang G., Yew A.K.S., Chou S.M., Wong Y.R., Tay S.C., Lie D.T.T. Biomechanical comparison of vertical suture techniques for repairing radial meniscus tear. J. Exp. Orthop. 2020; 7(1): 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-020-00296-w
27. Oosten J., Yoder R., DiBartola A., Bowler J., Sparks A., Duerr R., et al. Several techniques exist with favorable biomechanical outcomes in radial meniscus tear repair – a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2022; 38(8): 2557–78.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2022.02.010
28. Yang B.W., Liotta E.S., Paschos N. Outcomes of meniscus repair in children and adolescents. Curr. Rev. Musculoskelet. Med. 2019; 12(2): 233–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-019-09554-6
Review
For citations:
Basargin D.Yu., Chelpachenko O.B., Vorobyov D.A., Lushnikov A.M. Improvement of surgical treatment of posterior meniscus injuries in children. Russian Pediatric Journal. 2025;28(5):337-343. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46563/1560-9561-2025-28-5-337-343. EDN: bkzwbt
JATS XML




















